Assembly begins pushing legislative ethics reforms
Ethics
Lawmakers would be barred from accepting more than one taxpayer-paid health insurance plan and from taking campaign donations from their aides under measures pushed forward Thursday by Assembly legislators.
The measures released by the Assembly State Government Committee come as legislators also prepare to revamp an oft-criticized legislative ethics committee.
Legislative staff said it can't be estimated how much money the bill to limit health insurance benefits would save because it is not known how many officials receive benefits under more than one plan.
Still, sponsors said it would be a sensible move, especially with the state suffering chronic fiscal problems.
"Taking action to address this problem will be just one step in a long process of getting government costs under control in New Jersey, but it is a significant step," said the sponsor, Assemblyman Declan O'Scanlon, R-Monmouth, who vowed to introduce legislation to bar all state workers from accepting more than one taxpayer-paid health insurance plan.
Legislators have tried to pass versions of the bill into law since 2003 without success. It passed the Assembly during the last session, but never received Senate consideration.
The measure to bar legislative aides and their immediate family members from making political contributions to the legislator that employs them would continue for two years after an aide stopped working for the legislator.
Violators would face up to 18 months in prison and a fine of up to $10,000.
"While some of these contributions may be well-intentioned, they allow for a form of kickback whereby a legislator pays the salary of the aide with taxpayer funds, and the aide then kicks back those dollars to his or her boss by way of campaign contributions," said Assemblyman Jay Webber, R-Morris, a bill sponsor.
He noted that congressional staffers cannot contribute to their employers.
"This bill strikes a blow against what I call the culture of soft corruption in Trenton," Webber said.
Assembly and Senate committees are scheduled on Monday to weigh a plan pushed by Assembly Speaker Joseph Roberts Jr. to revamp the much-criticized legislative ethics committee, which has chastised few legislators and been rife with partisan bickering.
Roberts wants to remove lawmakers from it and replace them with retired prosecutors, Supreme Court justices and Superior Court judges and give the panel more authority.
Related listings
-
Web Page Disclaimers in New Hampshire
Ethics 02/29/2008Effective January 1, 2008, New Hampshireadopted a rule that clearly protects persons who, in good faith, e-mailconfidential information to a lawyer from having the lawyer use theinformation against the prospective client. The comments to NewHam...
-
Qualcomm v. Broadcom Confidentiality Hurts
Ethics 02/26/2008A blockbuster decision was issued in the notorious “take no prisoners,” “bet the company,” Qualcomm v. Broadcom, Case No. 05cv1958-B, in San Diego. In a heart-wrenching decision, the lawyers are being prevented from disclosing what really occurred, b...
-
Arizona Lawyers May Not Ethically Participate
Ethics 07/06/1999Arizona lawyers may not ethically participate in an Internet servicethat sends legal questions from individuals to attorneys based upon thesubject matter of the question. The opinion also notes that lawyers cannot pay a fee for such referrals or give...
USCIS Adjusting Premium Processing Fee
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it is adjusting the premium processing fee for Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker and Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers beginning on Oct. 1, 2018 to more effectively adjudicate petitions and maintain effective service to petitioners.
The premium processing fee will increase to $1,410, a 14.92 percent increase (after rounding) from the current fee of $1,225. This increase, which is done in accordance with the Immigration and Nationality Act, represents the percentage change in inflation since the fee was last increased in 2010 based on the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers.
“Because premium processing fees have not been adjusted since 2010, our ability to improve the adjudications and service processes for all petitioners has been hindered as we’ve experienced significantly higher demand for immigration benefits. Ultimately, adjusting the premium processing fee will allow us to continue making necessary investments in staff and technology to administer various immigration benefit requests more effectively and efficiently,” said Chief Financial Officer Joseph Moore. “USCIS will continue adjudicating all petitions on a case-by-case basis to determine if they meet all standards required under applicable law, policies, and regulations.”
Premium processing is an optional service that is currently authorized for certain petitioners filing Forms I-129 or I-140. The system allows petitioners to request 15-day processing of certain employment-based immigration benefit requests if they pay an extra fee. The premium processing fee is paid in addition to the base filing fee and any other applicable fees, which cannot be waived.